Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Villetto v. Terio

Villetto v. Terio

146 A.D.2d 697, 538 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 631
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 23, 1989
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 146 A.D.2d 697 (Villetto v. Terio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Villetto v. Terio, 146 A.D.2d 697, 538 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 631 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

— In a breach of contract action, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Braatz, J.), dated April 27, 1988, which denied his motion to vacate a default judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Our review of the record reveals that the defendant failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his default (see, Skidelsky v Merendino, 133 AD2d 149). Therefore, it was not an improvident exercise of discretion for the Supreme Court to deny his motion to vacate the default judgment. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Eiber, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. TLC Women's Services, Inc.
157 A.D.2d 764 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 A.D.2d 697, 538 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/villetto-v-terio-nyappdiv-1989.