Villegas v. Villegas

696 So. 2d 380, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4979, 1997 WL 231541
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 9, 1997
DocketNo. 96-2773
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 696 So. 2d 380 (Villegas v. Villegas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Villegas v. Villegas, 696 So. 2d 380, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4979, 1997 WL 231541 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinions

THOMPSON, Judge.

We affirm the final summary judgment. See Snow v. Nelson, 475 So.2d 225 (Fla.1985); Carey v. Reeve, 56 Wash.App. 18, 781 P.2d 904, 908 (1989) (‘Whether the duty owed by the [grandparents] to third parties was either as parents, standing in loco parentis; a duty created by Restatement (Second) of Torts § 316 [parent’s duty to control child’s conduct]; a ‘special relationship’ duty created by Restatement (Second) of Torts § 315; or even under a duty because they voluntarily assumed responsibility for the child, the standard is the same.”)

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON, C.J., concurs. DAUKSCH, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morris v. Division of Retirement
696 So. 2d 380 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
696 So. 2d 380, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4979, 1997 WL 231541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/villegas-v-villegas-fladistctapp-1997.