Villegas v. Takoma Park Police Department

Fourth Circuit

Villegas v. Takoma Park Police Department

618 F. App'x 757

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 1, 2015·No. No. 15-1544·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Villegas, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accord[758] ingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Villegas v. Takoma Park Police Dep’t, No. 8:13-cv-03782-KWT, 2015 WL 1531269 (D.Md. Apr. 3, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Villegas, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accord[758] ingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Villegas v. Takoma Park Police Dep’t, No. 8:13-cv-03782-KWT, 2015 WL 1531269 (D.Md. Apr. 3, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Villegas v. Takoma Park Police Department, 618 F. App'x 757 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

618 F. App'x 757 (Villegas v. Takoma Park Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.