Villegas, Ex Parte Carlos Alejandro

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 22, 2012
DocketAP-76,729
StatusPublished

This text of Villegas, Ex Parte Carlos Alejandro (Villegas, Ex Parte Carlos Alejandro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Villegas, Ex Parte Carlos Alejandro, (Tex. 2012).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. AP-76,729
EX PARTE CARLOS A. VILLEGAS, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. F-0622654-P IN THE 203RD DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty and was convicted of possession with intent to deliver over 400 grams of cocaine. The trial court sentenced Applicant to twenty years' imprisonment. On appeal, Applicant raised a claim of cruel and unusual punishment and the Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Villegas v. State, No. 05-07-00294-CR (Tex. App.-Dallas, Nov. 27, 2007, pet. ref'd).

Applicant contends that his sentence is illegal because it does not contain a fine, which is mandated under the statute. Tex. Health & Safety Code §481.112(f). We order that this application be filed and set for submission to determine whether: (1) the fine listed under Texas Health and Safety Code Section 481.112(f) is mandatory; (2) a claim that a mandatory fine was not assessed and therefore a sentence is illegal is properly raised for the first time on a writ of habeas corpus; and (3) if such a claim can be raised for the first time on habeas, and if it is meritorious, what the proper remedy for such a claim would be. The parties shall brief these issues. Oral argument is permitted.

The trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and desires to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art 26.04. The trial court shall send to this Court, within 30 days of the date of this order, a supplemental transcript containing either the order appointing counsel or a statement that Applicant is not indigent. All briefs shall be filed with this Court within 60 days of the date of his order.



Filed: February 22, 2012

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Villegas, Ex Parte Carlos Alejandro, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/villegas-ex-parte-carlos-alejandro-texcrimapp-2012.