Villeda v. Prince George's County
This text of 70 F. App'x 720 (Villeda v. Prince George's County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Walter Villeda appeals the district court’s order awarding Prince George’s County and Detective Godfrey summary judgment in his civil action, in which he alleged Fourth Amendment and pendent state law claims in regard to his arrest by Godfrey. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Villeda v. Prince George’s County, 219 F.Supp.2d 696, No. CA-01-2566-DKC (D.Md. Aug. 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 F. App'x 720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/villeda-v-prince-georges-county-ca4-2003.