Villas at Parkside Partners v. City of Farmers Branch

688 F.3d 801, 2012 WL 3085535

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 31, 2012·No. 10-10751·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion March 21, 2012, 5th Cir., 2012, 675 F.3d 802)

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, DAVIS, SMITH, GARZA, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.¹

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion March 21, 2012, 5th Cir., 2012, 675 F.3d 802)

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, DAVIS, SMITH, GARZA, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.¹

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

Villas at Parkside Partners v. City of Farmers Branch, 688 F.3d 801, 2012 WL 3085535 (5th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

688 F.3d 801 (Villas at Parkside Partners v. City of Farmers Branch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Fred Keller, Jr. v. City of Fremont

719 F.3d 931 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)

State of Mississippi v. AU Optronics Corporation

701 F.3d 796 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)

Opinion

Related