Villarreal v. State

687 So. 2d 256, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13239, 1996 WL 727144
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 19, 1996
DocketNo. 95-1348
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 687 So. 2d 256 (Villarreal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Villarreal v. State, 687 So. 2d 256, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13239, 1996 WL 727144 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s orders denying appellant’s motions to compel certain records pertaining to his prosecution. The record shows that appellant did not make a proper public records request either of the clerk of the court or the state attorney prior to filing the motions. As it would be improper to order an agency to produce records before it has had an opportunity to comply, the motions were properly denied. See § 119.07(1), Fla. Stat. (1995).

MINER, ALLEN and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keffer v. State
687 So. 2d 256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
687 So. 2d 256, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13239, 1996 WL 727144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/villarreal-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.