Villari, Mitchell & Co. v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Villari, Mitchell & Co. v. United States

147 F. 766, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4921

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedMay 31, 1906

DocketNo. 3,767

StatusPublished

This text of 147 F. 766 (Villari, Mitchell & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Villari, Mitchell & Co. v. United States, 147 F. 766, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4921 (circtsdny 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

PLATT, District Judge.

The merchandise in question consists of lemons in boxes. It was assessed for duty at one cent per pound under paragraph 266 of the Tariff Act of July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule G, 30 Stat. 172 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1651], upon the basis of the quantities stated in each of the invoices, and reported by the appraiser as having been actually imported. The importers protested claiming that said merchandise “is worthless and no longer merchandise, and therefore is not an article imported from a foreign country mentioned in any of the schedules of said Tariff Act, and no duty can be legally assessed upon the same.”

Upon the argument counsel for the government sought to sustain the action of the collector in the assessment of duty upon the ground that the importers had not availed themselves of the provision of the statute (section 23, Act of June 10, 1890, c. 407, 26 Stat. 140 [U. S. [767]*767Comp. St. 1901, p. 1930]) as promulgated in T. D. 21,831, relating to the abandonment of merchandise.

1 am satisfied from an examination of Treasury Decision 21,831 that it applies specifically to abandonment cases, and I do not think the importer is under any obligation to avail himself of the statute bearing upon the question of abandonment, and therefore I do not think it affects this case one way or the other. I have examined the testimony with some care, and I think I shall be compelled to follow the decision in Courtin, Golden & Co. v. U. S. (C. C.) 143 Fed. 551 (T. D. 26,998). The method of ascertaining the quantity of decayed fruit is fairly well enough in common with the method applied in that case.

The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PLATT, District Judge.

The merchandise in question consists of lemons in boxes. It was assessed for duty at one cent per pound under paragraph 266 of the Tariff Act of July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule G, 30 Stat. 172 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1651], upon the basis of the quantities stated in each of the invoices, and reported by the appraiser as having been actually imported. The importers protested claiming that said merchandise “is worthless and no longer merchandise, and therefore is not an article imported from a foreign country mentioned in any of the schedules of said Tariff Act, and no duty can be legally assessed upon the same.”

Upon the argument counsel for the government sought to sustain the action of the collector in the assessment of duty upon the ground that the importers had not availed themselves of the provision of the statute (section 23, Act of June 10, 1890, c. 407, 26 Stat. 140 [U. S. [767]*767Comp. St. 1901, p. 1930]) as promulgated in T. D. 21,831, relating to the abandonment of merchandise.

1 am satisfied from an examination of Treasury Decision 21,831 that it applies specifically to abandonment cases, and I do not think the importer is under any obligation to avail himself of the statute bearing upon the question of abandonment, and therefore I do not think it affects this case one way or the other. I have examined the testimony with some care, and I think I shall be compelled to follow the decision in Courtin, Golden & Co. v. U. S. (C. C.) 143 Fed. 551 (T. D. 26,998). The method of ascertaining the quantity of decayed fruit is fairly well enough in common with the method applied in that case.

The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 F. 766, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/villari-mitchell-co-v-united-states-circtsdny-1906.