Villareal v. Brown
229 A.D.2d 588, 646 N.Y.S.2d 288, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8326
Opinion
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit the respondents from retrying the petitioner under Queens County Indictment No. 12922/94 on the ground of double jeopardy.
Adjudged that the petition is granted, without costs or disbursements, and the indictment is dismissed for reasons stated in Matter of Maltz v Clabby (229 AD2d 580 [decided herewith]). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Villareal v. Brown, 229 A.D.2d 588, 646 N.Y.S.2d 288, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8326 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
229 A.D.2d 588 (Villareal v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Maltz v. Clabby
229 A.D.2d 580 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)