Villanueva, Ruben Jr
This text of Villanueva, Ruben Jr (Villanueva, Ruben Jr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-92,973-02
EX PARTE RUBEN VILLANUEVA, JR., AKA RUBEN VILLANUEVA, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 2019-DCR-02325-C IN THE 197TH DISTRICT COURT FROM CAMERON COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of one count of aggravated sexual assault and two counts of
indecency with a child by contact and sentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment. Applicant filed this
application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded
it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that, due to his incompetence, he did not knowingly and voluntarily
waive his trial rights and his guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary. He has provided records
which, he asserts, show that he suffered from extreme mental illness and lacked the ability to enter
into binding agreements at the time of the plea proceeeding. 2
Applicant also states that he received ineffective assistance of defense counsel because
counsel failed to investigate and request an evaluation of Applicant’s competence. Applicant asserts
that, if counsel had requested a competency hearing and obtained an evaluation, Applicant would
have been found incompetent.
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Brady v. United States,
397 U.S. 742 (1970); Boyett v. State, 545 S.W.3d 556, 563-64 (Tex. Crim. App. 2018); Ex parte
Lahood, 401 S.W.3d 45, 50 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Accordingly, the record should be developed.
The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, §
3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the
record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d).
It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing,
it shall determine if Applicant is represented by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indigent.
If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s
plea was involuntary. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems
appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested 3
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: October 27, 2021 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Villanueva, Ruben Jr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/villanueva-ruben-jr-texcrimapp-2021.