Villanti v. Rusakowicz

57 A.D.2d 616, 393 N.Y.S.2d 771, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11627
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 25, 1977·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the [617]*617Supreme Court, Queens County, entered February 24, 1976, which is in favor of the defendant-respondent and against him, following a jury trial. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. No fact issues were presented on this appeal. The trial court improperly indicated, in its charge to the jury, that it did not believe that .the witness who testified on behalf of the plaintiff-appellant was telling the truth. In our opinion, this deprived the plaintiff of his right to a fair trial. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Villanti v. Rusakowicz, 57 A.D.2d 616, 393 N.Y.S.2d 771, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11627 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

57 A.D.2d 616 (Villanti v. Rusakowicz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Butler
57 A.D.2d 931 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)