Villano v. Villano
This text of 408 So. 2d 743 (Villano v. Villano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We find no abuse of discretion with respect to the challenged portions of the final judgment of dissolution which (a) awarded the wife the husband’s interest in the marital home as lump-sum alimony, Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Rosen v. Rosen, 386 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), rev. denied, 392 So.2d 1378 (Fla.1981); Hague v. Hague, 382 So.2d 852 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), and cases cited and (b) awarded the wife attorney’s fees in the proceedings below, Canakaris v. Canakaris, supra; Dominik v. Dominik, 390 So.2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
408 So. 2d 743, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/villano-v-villano-fladistctapp-1982.