Villano v. Villano

408 So. 2d 743, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18942
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 12, 1982
DocketNo. 80-2374
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 408 So. 2d 743 (Villano v. Villano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Villano v. Villano, 408 So. 2d 743, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18942 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We find no abuse of discretion with respect to the challenged portions of the final judgment of dissolution which (a) awarded the wife the husband’s interest in the marital home as lump-sum alimony, Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Rosen v. Rosen, 386 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), rev. denied, 392 So.2d 1378 (Fla.1981); Hague v. Hague, 382 So.2d 852 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), and cases cited and (b) awarded the wife attorney’s fees in the proceedings below, Canakaris v. Canakaris, supra; Dominik v. Dominik, 390 So.2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harris v. Harris
498 So. 2d 1046 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
408 So. 2d 743, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/villano-v-villano-fladistctapp-1982.