Villano v. New York Times Co.

163 A.D. 842, 146 N.Y.S. 883

This text of 163 A.D. 842 (Villano v. New York Times Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Villano v. New York Times Co., 163 A.D. 842, 146 N.Y.S. 883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The verdict of the jury that the defendant was negligent and that plaintiff was free from contributory negligence was without competent evidence to support it. It is also clear that the declarations of the [843]*843. deceased and Dunlap were incompetent, and were improperly received in evidence. The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 A.D. 842, 146 N.Y.S. 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/villano-v-new-york-times-co-nyappdiv-1914.