Villani v. National City Bank

189 N.E. 570, 263 N.Y. 512, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1307
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 27, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 189 N.E. 570 (Villani v. National City Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Villani v. National City Bank, 189 N.E. 570, 263 N.Y. 512, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1307 (N.Y. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action brought by plaintiffs to recover a deposit alleged to have been made in the Williamsburg branch of the Bank of America National Association, which bank was later absorbed by merger with the defendant National City Bank of New York.

Certain funds were delivered by the plaintiff Rose Villani to one Lupis, a teller in the bank. The funds were not received by the bank but were fraudulently appropriated by Lupis. Plaintiffs contend that the funds were delivered to Lupis at the bank upon his representation that the bank would pay ten per cent interest on the deposit if left with the bank for one year. The defendant contends that the whole transaction took place outside the bank and was a personal transaction between Lupis and the plaintiff Rose, not binding on the bank.

*514 At the close of the main charge, defendant’s counsel requested the court to submit that question to the jury. The request was refused and the court stated that there was no evidence in the record that any transaction took place outside of the bank. Defendant’s counsel duly excepted. The statement and refusal to charge constituted reversible error. If there was testimony that the transactions took place outside of the bank and the money was appropriated by Lupis, the defendant was entitled to have that question submitted to the jury. The record contains evidence which would have justified the jury in finding that the transactions or part of them took place outside the bank. (Fidelity & Deposit Co v. Colby, 148 App. Div. 363; affd., 210 N. Y. 584.)

The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs and .Crouch, JJ., concur; Kellogg, J., not voting.

Judgments reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland v. . Colby
104 N.E. 1126 (New York Court of Appeals, 1914)
Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Colby
148 A.D. 363 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 N.E. 570, 263 N.Y. 512, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/villani-v-national-city-bank-ny-1934.