Villaneuva v. State
This text of 45 Fla. Supp. 89 (Villaneuva v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was not brought to trial within the time provided by the speedy trial rule, 3.191(a)(1), Rules of Criminal Procedure. The only entity whose “fault” was responsible for this being true was the U. S. Postal Service, which failed to deliver a properly addressed notice to the defendant. Since, however, this fault cannot, under the applicable rule, be attributed to the defendant and since he therefore was shown to have been available for trial during the critical period, he was entitled to discharge under the rule. The judgment against him therefore is reversed with directions to discharge the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 Fla. Supp. 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/villaneuva-v-state-flacirct-1976.