Villaneuva v. Simpson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Villaneuva v. Simpson

109 A.D.2d 880, 487 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47400

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 109 A.D.2d 880 (Villaneuva v. Simpson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Villaneuva v. Simpson, 109 A.D.2d 880, 487 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47400 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of respondent New York City Transit Authority, dated November 3, 1982, which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of certain charges and terminated his employment.

[881]*881Petition granted, determination annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, charges dismissed, and petitioner reinstated.

Petitioner, a conductor, was charged with and found guilty of violating Rules and Regulations Governing Employees Engaged in the Operation of the New York City Transit System, rules 10 (a), (b); 35, in that he allegedly assaulted one William Perez with a knife and failed to obey the lawful order of a police officer. We note that the criminal charges against petitioner were dismissed on motion of the District Attorney.

The incident occurred when petitioner was off duty on a city street, and not on transit system property. The rules allegedly violated prohibit misconduct while on duty or on transit system property, or misconduct which would interfere with the efficiency or discipline of the transit system. Petitioner’s objectionable conduct was totally unrelated to his employment or to the transit system. Therefore, there is neither substantial evidence nor a rational basis upon which petitioner could have been found to have violated the afore-mentioned rules. Respondent’s determination is hereby annulled, the charges are dismissed, and petitioner is reinstated.

In light of our decision, we need not consider petitioner’s remaining contentions. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of respondent New York City Transit Authority, dated November 3, 1982, which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of certain charges and terminated his employment.

[881]*881Petition granted, determination annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, charges dismissed, and petitioner reinstated.

Petitioner, a conductor, was charged with and found guilty of violating Rules and Regulations Governing Employees Engaged in the Operation of the New York City Transit System, rules 10 (a), (b); 35, in that he allegedly assaulted one William Perez with a knife and failed to obey the lawful order of a police officer. We note that the criminal charges against petitioner were dismissed on motion of the District Attorney.

The incident occurred when petitioner was off duty on a city street, and not on transit system property. The rules allegedly violated prohibit misconduct while on duty or on transit system property, or misconduct which would interfere with the efficiency or discipline of the transit system. Petitioner’s objectionable conduct was totally unrelated to his employment or to the transit system. Therefore, there is neither substantial evidence nor a rational basis upon which petitioner could have been found to have violated the afore-mentioned rules. Respondent’s determination is hereby annulled, the charges are dismissed, and petitioner is reinstated.

In light of our decision, we need not consider petitioner’s remaining contentions. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 A.D.2d 880, 487 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/villaneuva-v-simpson-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack