Villalobos v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Villalobos v. State

614 So. 2d 585, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2008, 1993 WL 36273

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Villalobos v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3755 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 17, 1993·No. No. 92-1437·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance (Count I) and possession of drug paraphernalia (Count II). On Count I she was sentenced to five and a half years in prison with a three year mandatory minimum and a $50,000 fine. The sentence on Count II was suspended.-

The judgments on Counts I and II are affirmed. The sentence on Count I, which departed from the sentencing guidelines without providing written reasons for the departure, is vacated and this cause is re-. manded for the purpose of resentencing on Count I.

Judgment affirmed, sentence vacated and remanded.

ANSTEAD and .WARNER, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance (Count I) and possession of drug paraphernalia (Count II). On Count I she was sentenced to five and a half years in prison with a three year mandatory minimum and a $50,000 fine. The sentence on Count II was suspended.-

The judgments on Counts I and II are affirmed. The sentence on Count I, which departed from the sentencing guidelines without providing written reasons for the departure, is vacated and this cause is re-. manded for the purpose of resentencing on Count I.

Judgment affirmed, sentence vacated and remanded.

ANSTEAD and .WARNER, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

Villalobos v. State, 614 So. 2d 585, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2008, 1993 WL 36273 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

614 So. 2d 585 (Villalobos v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.