Villalba v. New York City Department of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Villalba v. New York City Department of Education

50 A.D.3d 279, 853 N.Y.S.2d 881

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 2008

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 A.D.3d 279 (Villalba v. New York City Department of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Villalba v. New York City Department of Education, 50 A.D.3d 279, 853 N.Y.S.2d 881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), entered October 19, 2006, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondent Board of Education’s determinations rating her job performance as unsatisfactory and dismissing her from her position as a probationary assistant principal, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The “U” ratings are unreviewable for failure to exhaust the grievance procedures set forth in the collective bargaining agreement (Matter of Plummer v Klepak, 48 NY2d 486 [1979], cert denied 445 US 952 [1980]; Matter of Cantres v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y, 145 AD2d 359, 361 [1988]). Concur—Gonzalez, J.P., Williams, Catterson and Moskowitz, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), entered October 19, 2006, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondent Board of Education’s determinations rating her job performance as unsatisfactory and dismissing her from her position as a probationary assistant principal, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The “U” ratings are unreviewable for failure to exhaust the grievance procedures set forth in the collective bargaining agreement (Matter of Plummer v Klepak, 48 NY2d 486 [1979], cert denied 445 US 952 [1980]; Matter of Cantres v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y, 145 AD2d 359, 361 [1988]). Concur—Gonzalez, J.P., Williams, Catterson and Moskowitz, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.3d 279, 853 N.Y.S.2d 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/villalba-v-new-york-city-department-of-education-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack