Village Voice, Inc., Et Al v. Rinaldi
This text of 423 U.S. 883 (Village Voice, Inc., Et Al v. Rinaldi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied for want of a final judgment. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the view, stated in his previous opinions1 and those of Mr. Justice Black,2 that any state or federal libel law imposing liability for discussion of public affairs abridges freedom of speech and of the press contrary to the First and Fourteenth Amendments. He is also of the view, stated in his opinion in Mills v. Alabama, 384 U. S. 214, 221-222 (1966), 3 that the judgment below is final because further proceedings are precluded in the state court and the present posture of that judgment upon remand will deter others from exercising their constitutional right to discuss public affairs. Mr. Justice *884 Douglas would therefore grant certiorari and summarily reverse the judgment.
Cf. Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U. S. 469, 484-487 (1975); Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo, 418 U. S. 241, 246-247 and n. 6 (1974).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
423 U.S. 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/village-voice-inc-et-al-v-rinaldi-scotus-1975.