Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Village of Wyoming v. Ohio Traction Co.

Village of Wyoming v. Ohio Traction Co.

104 Ohio St. (N.S.) 325
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 7, 1922
DocketNo. 17148
StatusPublished

This text of 104 Ohio St. (N.S.) 325 (Village of Wyoming v. Ohio Traction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Village of Wyoming v. Ohio Traction Co., 104 Ohio St. (N.S.) 325 (Ohio 1922).

Opinions

[326]*326It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be, and the same hereby is, reversed. And this court coming now to render the judgment that the court of appeals should have rendered, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that this cause be remanded to the court of appeals with instructions to enter the injunction prayed for in the petition of the plaintiff below.

Inasmuch as the judges who concur in the judgment in this case do not agree upon the grounds upon which the judgment is put, no authoritative opinion is filed, but the several judges concurring may file opinions setting forth their views.

Judgment reversed.

Marshall, C. J., Johnson, Hough and Wanamaker, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
154 U.S. 362 (Supreme Court, 1894)
Freeport Water Co. v. Freeport City
180 U.S. 587 (Supreme Court, 1901)
Detroit v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.
184 U.S. 368 (Supreme Court, 1902)
Knoxville Water Co. v. Knoxville
189 U.S. 434 (Supreme Court, 1903)
San Diego Land & Town Co. v. Jasper
189 U.S. 439 (Supreme Court, 1903)
City of Cleveland v. Cleveland City Railway Co.
194 U.S. 517 (Supreme Court, 1904)
Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los Angeles
211 U.S. 265 (Supreme Court, 1908)
City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.
212 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.
212 U.S. 19 (Supreme Court, 1909)
City of Minneapolis v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.
215 U.S. 417 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mottley
219 U.S. 467 (Supreme Court, 1911)
Cedar Rapids Gas Light Co. v. City of Cedar Rapids
223 U.S. 655 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Des Moines Gas Co. v. City of Des Moines
238 U.S. 153 (Supreme Court, 1915)
City of Cincinnati v. Cincinnati & Hamilton Traction Co.
245 U.S. 446 (Supreme Court, 1916)
City and County of Denver v. Denver Union Water Co.
246 U.S. 178 (Supreme Court, 1918)
Columbus Railway, Power & Light Co. v. City of Columbus
249 U.S. 399 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Southern Iowa Electric Co. v. City of Chariton
255 U.S. 539 (Supreme Court, 1921)
Smyth v. Ames
169 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 Ohio St. (N.S.) 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/village-of-wyoming-v-ohio-traction-co-ohio-1922.