Village of Waite Hill v. Board of Tax Appeals

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 473
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 6, 1961·No. No. 36902·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The question presented is whether the Board of Tax Appeals has jurisdiction over such applications filed by the village after it has divested itself of legal title to the property.

[474]*474This question must be answered in the negative. There is nothing in the record to indicate that, after selling the property, the village had any interest therein or was obligated to pay taxes thereon. It may not, therefore, apply for exemption from taxation or remission of taxes.

The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

Decision affirmed.

Zimmerman, acting C. J., Younger, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Zimmerman, J., sitting in the place and stead of Weygandt, C. J. Younger, J., of the Third Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Zimmerman, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Village of Waite Hill v. Board of Tax Appeals, 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 473 (Ohio 1961).

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 473 (Village of Waite Hill v. Board of Tax Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.