Village of Vermont v. Miller

60 Ill. App. 166, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 667
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided June 13, 1895·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was a bill in chancery to enjoin the appellant village from opening an alleged street in the village, upon the ground that such street had not been' legally platted or dedicatect to the village, and upon the further ground that the complainant in the bill (the appellees)' had had open, adverse and continuous possession of the strip of ground claimed as a street for more than twenty years. The village claimed a perpetual easement and the appellees claimed title by virtue of their adverse possession.

A freehold was therefore involved. Chaplin v. Com. of Highways, 126 Ill. 264; Town of Brushy Mound v. McClintock, 146 Ill. 643.

We are without jurisdiction, to entertain the appeal.

Appeal dismissed. Leave given the parties to withdraw record, abstracts and briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Village of Vermont v. Miller, 60 Ill. App. 166, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 667 (Ill. Ct. App. 1895).

60 Ill. App. 166 (Village of Vermont v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chaplin v. Commissioners of Highways
18 N.E. 765 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1888)
Town of Brushy Mound v. McClintock
35 N.E. 159 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1893)