Village of Upper Nyack v. Village of Nyack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Village of Upper Nyack v. Village of Nyack

30 A.D.2d 811, 293 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3519

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 1, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 811 (Village of Upper Nyack v. Village of Nyack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Village of Upper Nyack v. Village of Nyack, 30 A.D.2d 811, 293 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3519 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

In a condemnation proceeding by the Village of Upper Nyack to acquire a water distribution system owned by the Village of Nyack but located entirely within the boundaries of the petitioning Village, the Village of Nyack appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated June 19, 1967, which adjudged that the Village of Upper Nyack is entitled to take the property for the use specified. Judgment affirmed, without costs. We agree that the Village of Upper Nyack is entitled to judgment adjudging that the property in question is necessary for the public use. However, in making such determination we in no way pass upon the validity of the proposed sale of the condemned property by that Village to the Spring Valley Water Company. Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a condemnation proceeding by the Village of Upper Nyack to acquire a water distribution system owned by the Village of Nyack but located entirely within the boundaries of the petitioning Village, the Village of Nyack appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated June 19, 1967, which adjudged that the Village of Upper Nyack is entitled to take the property for the use specified. Judgment affirmed, without costs. We agree that the Village of Upper Nyack is entitled to judgment adjudging that the property in question is necessary for the public use. However, in making such determination we in no way pass upon the validity of the proposed sale of the condemned property by that Village to the Spring Valley Water Company. Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 811, 293 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/village-of-upper-nyack-v-village-of-nyack-nyappdiv-1968.