Village of Springville v. Amherst Construction Inc.
This text of 152 A.D.2d 963 (Village of Springville v. Amherst Construction Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously modified on the law and defendant’s cross motion granted and as modified affirmed with costs to defendant Amherst Construction, Inc., in accordance with the following memorandum: Special Term properly denied plaintiff’s application to vacate the arbitration proceeding (see, Sherrill v Grayco Bldrs., 64 NY2d 261, 273-274; Faberge Inti, v Di Pino, 109 AD2d 235, 239). To effect an orderly process, however, plaintiff’s action against the multiple defendants should be stayed until completion of the arbitration (see, Carthage Cent. School Dist. No. 1 v Reddick & Sons, 79 AD2d 883, 884). (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J. — arbitration.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Pine, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
152 A.D.2d 963, 544 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/village-of-springville-v-amherst-construction-inc-nyappdiv-1989.