Village of Springville v. Amherst Construction Inc.

152 A.D.2d 963, 544 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9859

Opinion

Order unanimously modified on the law and defendant’s cross motion granted and as modified affirmed with costs to defendant Amherst Construction, Inc., in accordance with the following memorandum: Special Term properly denied plaintiff’s application to vacate the arbitration proceeding (see, Sherrill v Grayco Bldrs., 64 NY2d 261, 273-274; Faberge Inti, v Di Pino, 109 AD2d 235, 239). To effect an orderly process, however, plaintiff’s action against the multiple defendants should be stayed until completion of the arbitration (see, Carthage Cent. School Dist. No. 1 v Reddick & Sons, 79 AD2d 883, 884). (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J. — arbitration.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Village of Springville v. Amherst Construction Inc., 152 A.D.2d 963, 544 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

152 A.D.2d 963 (Village of Springville v. Amherst Construction Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sherrill v. Grayco Builders, Inc.
475 N.E.2d 772 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Carthage Central School District No. 1 v. Reddick & Sons of Gouverneur, Inc.
79 A.D.2d 883 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Faberge International, Inc. v. Di Pino
109 A.D.2d 235 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)