Village of Silverton v. Schmidt

Ohio Supreme Court

Village of Silverton v. Schmidt

81 Ohio St. (N.S.) 502

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 19, 1909

DocketNo. 11593

StatusPublished

This text of 81 Ohio St. (N.S.) 502 (Village of Silverton v. Schmidt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Village of Silverton v. Schmidt, 81 Ohio St. (N.S.) 502 (Ohio 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment modified as stated in journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of said circuit court be and the same is hereby [503]*503reversed for error in affirming without modification the judgment of the court of common pleas of Hamilton county. And this court being of opinion that the court of common pleas was without power to assess against the plaintiff below any part of the expense of stenographer’s fees in the mayor’s court; and that said court of common pleas erred in overruling the plaintiff’s motion to retax the costs in said case, its judgment in that behalf is by this court reversed. And this cause is remanded to the court of common pleas of Hamilton county with direction to sustain said motion and to order the costs retaxed accordingly. In other respects the judgment of said court of common pleas is affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear and Price, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment modified as stated in journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of said circuit court be and the same is hereby [503]*503reversed for error in affirming without modification the judgment of the court of common pleas of Hamilton county. And this court being of opinion that the court of common pleas was without power to assess against the plaintiff below any part of the expense of stenographer’s fees in the mayor’s court; and that said court of common pleas erred in overruling the plaintiff’s motion to retax the costs in said case, its judgment in that behalf is by this court reversed. And this cause is remanded to the court of common pleas of Hamilton county with direction to sustain said motion and to order the costs retaxed accordingly. In other respects the judgment of said court of common pleas is affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear and Price, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 Ohio St. (N.S.) 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/village-of-silverton-v-schmidt-ohio-1909.