Village of Saranac Lake v. Gillispie

261 A.D. 854, 24 N.Y.S.2d 403, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7777
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 8, 1941
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 261 A.D. 854 (Village of Saranac Lake v. Gillispie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Village of Saranac Lake v. Gillispie, 261 A.D. 854, 24 N.Y.S.2d 403, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7777 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

— ■ This is an appeal from an order of the Essex Special Term of the Supreme Court directing the members of the town board of the town of St. Armand ,to execute their consent to the petition for the annexation by the village of Saranac Lake of territory in the town of St. Armand. The village of Saranac Lake is the owner of a plot of land of six acres in the town of St. Armand, a mile and a half distant from the village line. It erected a disposal plant thereon and connected the same with the village sewers by a pipe line. The village is also the owner of a strip of land ten feet wide through which the conduit runs which extends from the village line to the six-acre plot. The village instituted this proceeding under section 348 of the Village Law and its petition complies with all the provisions of that section. -The Special Term directed the officials of the town to execute their consent to the annexation. The court held that all the territory sought to be annexed adjoined the village. This determination is correct. (Jarl Co. v. Village of Croton-on-Hudson, 148 Misc. 150; affd., 238 App. Div. 865; affd., 262 N. Y. 551; Jarl Co. v. Village of Croton-on-Hudson, 148 Misc. 153; affd., 238 App. Div. 865; affd., 262 N. Y. 551.) Order of the Special Term affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffeman, Schenck and Poster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Missoula Rural Fire District v. City of Missoula
950 P.2d 758 (Montana Supreme Court, 1997)
Civil City of Gas City v. Eastbrook Community School Corp.
377 N.E.2d 424 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1978)
Ridings v. City of Owensboro
383 S.W.2d 510 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1964)
People ex rel. Village of Spring Valley v. Schroeder
189 Misc. 324 (New York Supreme Court, 1947)
Lefler v. City of Dallas
177 S.W.2d 231 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 A.D. 854, 24 N.Y.S.2d 403, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/village-of-saranac-lake-v-gillispie-nyappdiv-1941.