Village of Sandy Hill v. Akin

84 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 537
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1894·Published

Opinion

Hejrriok, J.:

The judgment in this case should be affirmed. The assessment for personal property against the heirs of a person deceased, without naming them, is void. It does not follow the statute. (Cruger v. Dougherty, 43 N. Y. 107; Trowbridge v. Horan, 78 id. 439; Cromwell v. MacLean, 123 id. 474.)

Mayham, P. J., and Putnam, J., concurred.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Village of Sandy Hill v. Akin, 84 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 537 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

84 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 537 (Village of Sandy Hill v. Akin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cruger v. . Dougherty
43 N.Y. 107 (New York Court of Appeals, 1870)