Village of Massena v. Lomenzo

58 Misc. 2d 40, 294 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1205
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 11, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 58 Misc. 2d 40 (Village of Massena v. Lomenzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Village of Massena v. Lomenzo, 58 Misc. 2d 40, 294 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1205 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1968).

Opinion

De Fobest C. Pitt, J.

The petitioner, Village of Massena, New York, seeks by this article 78 proceeding to compel the [41]*41respondent, Secretary of State, to accept for filing its Local Law No. 1, 1967. The local law in question consists of a complete revised charter, ordinances and local laws with repealers of all inconsistent ordinances and local laws then in effect. It appears to be a complete codification of all laws of the village. The respondent, in addition to answering the petition, has moved to dismiss the same for insufficiency.

The court is of the opinion that the petition should be dismissed. From a reading of the same it is obvious that the proposed law contains matters requiring either mandatory or permissive referenda and that more than one subject is covered. In the absence of referenda and by covering more than one subject it appears, that the law is not ready for filing. (Municipal Home Rule Law, §§ 20, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27; Matter of Astwood v. Cohen, 291 N. Y. 484.)

The court cannot agree that the Secretary of State may exercise no discretion in the filing of local laws so as to give rise to the unusual and drastic remedy of mandamus. (Matter of Noonan v. O’Leary, 284 App. Div. 646; Matter of Glen Cove Shopping Center v. Suozzi, 8 Misc 2d 247.) Having discretion in the matter and noting the above it may not be said that the refusal to file the local law was an arbitrary or capricious act. Accordingly, it is felt that the court should not intervene. Submit judgment dismissing the petition herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cruz v. Deierlein
208 A.D.2d 785 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Opn. No.
New York Attorney General Reports, 1976

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 Misc. 2d 40, 294 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/village-of-massena-v-lomenzo-nysupct-1968.