Village of Loch Arbour v. Ocean Tp.
This text of 158 A.2d 332 (Village of Loch Arbour v. Ocean Tp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE VILLAGE OF LOCH ARBOUR, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DANIEL E. MANN AND MILDRED M. LOUCKS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
OCEAN TOWNSHIP, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, BENJAMIN R. HARVEY, THE BUILDING INSPECTOR OF SAID TOWNSHIP AND DEAL GARDENS, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Robert V. Carton and Mr. Sidney Hertz argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Stout & O'Hagan, and Durand, Ivins and Carton, attorneys; and Mr. Louis P. Introcaso, on the brief).
Mr. Aaron Melniker argued the cause for the respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Knight in the court below.
For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO 6.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 A.2d 332, 31 N.J. 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/village-of-loch-arbour-v-ocean-tp-nj-1960.