Village of Lindenhurst v. Hendrickson Bros.

94 A.D.3d 1100, 942 N.Y.S.2d 808
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 24, 2012·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for continuing public nuisance, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J.), dated June 6, 2011, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff alleges that, pursuant to a contract with Suffolk County, the defendant completed certain sewer construction [1101]*1101work in 1978, and. that defects in the construction work constitute and contribute to a continuing public nuisance. The action is time-barred for the reasons stated in the companion case of Village of Lindenhurst v J.D. Posillico, Inc. (94 AD3d 1101 [2012] [decided herewith]).

The plaintiffs contentions relating to alleged statutory violations are not properly before this Court. Rivera, J.E, Dillon, Angiolillo and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Village of Lindenhurst v. Hendrickson Bros., 94 A.D.3d 1100, 942 N.Y.S.2d 808 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

94 A.D.3d 1100 (Village of Lindenhurst v. Hendrickson Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Town of Oyster Bay v. Lizza Industries, Inc.
4 N.E.3d 944 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)