Village of Larchmont v. Town of Mamaroneck

New York Court of Appeals

Village of Larchmont v. Town of Mamaroneck

147 N.E. 191, 239 N.Y. 551, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 570

New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 25, 1924·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We do not pass upon the question of whether buildings, other than the one specified in the complaint, would be a violation of the zoning ordinance referred to. It is sufficient for this appeal to say the *552 injunction should be limited to the building mentioned in the complaint. To this extent the town should be enjoined.

The judgment appealed from, therefore, should be modified as stated in this memorandum, and as thus modified affirmed, without costs to either party.

Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ., concur.

Judgment modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We do not pass upon the question of whether buildings, other than the one specified in the complaint, would be a violation of the zoning ordinance referred to. It is sufficient for this appeal to say the *552 injunction should be limited to the building mentioned in the complaint. To this extent the town should be enjoined.

The judgment appealed from, therefore, should be modified as stated in this memorandum, and as thus modified affirmed, without costs to either party.

Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ., concur.

Judgment modified.

Village of Larchmont v. Town of Mamaroneck, 147 N.E. 191, 239 N.Y. 551, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 570 (N.Y. 1924).

Pincite

147 N.E. 191 (Village of Larchmont v. Town of Mamaroneck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related