Village of Larchmont v. Rawlings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Village of Larchmont v. Rawlings

82 A.D.2d 880, 441 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14581

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 82 A.D.2d 880 (Village of Larchmont v. Rawlings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Village of Larchmont v. Rawlings, 82 A.D.2d 880, 441 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14581 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by the Village of Larchmont to enforce its zoning regulations, the proposed interveners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ferraro, J.), dated April 29, 1980, which denied their motion to intervene. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted. In our view, the movants are aggrieved (see Matter of Douglaston Civic Assn. v Galvin, 36 NY2d 1; Matter of Sarah Lawrence Coll. v City Council of City of Yonkers, 48 AD2d 897) and have shown that the representation of their interest may be inadequate and that they may be bound by the judgment (see CPLR 1012, subd [a], par 2). Titone, J.P., Lazer, Weinstein and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by the Village of Larchmont to enforce its zoning regulations, the proposed interveners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ferraro, J.), dated April 29, 1980, which denied their motion to intervene. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted. In our view, the movants are aggrieved (see Matter of Douglaston Civic Assn. v Galvin, 36 NY2d 1; Matter of Sarah Lawrence Coll. v City Council of City of Yonkers, 48 AD2d 897) and have shown that the representation of their interest may be inadequate and that they may be bound by the judgment (see CPLR 1012, subd [a], par 2). Titone, J.P., Lazer, Weinstein and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 A.D.2d 880, 441 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/village-of-larchmont-v-rawlings-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack