Village of Holly v. HOLLY TOWNSHIP
708 N.W.2d 429, 474 Mich. 1025
This text of 708 N.W.2d 429 (Village of Holly v. HOLLY TOWNSHIP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Village of Holly v. HOLLY TOWNSHIP, 708 N.W.2d 429, 474 Mich. 1025 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
VILLAGE OF HOLLY and Downtown Development Authority of the Village of Holly, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
HOLLY TOWNSHIP and Holly Township Treasurer, Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion to file brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the July 26, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
708 N.W.2d 429, 474 Mich. 1025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/village-of-holly-v-holly-township-mich-2006.