Village of Great Neck Estates v. Bemak & Lehman, Inc.

223 A.D. 853
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1928·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Judgment dismissing complaint reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff, with costs. We are of opinion that the use to which the premises in question are being put by defendants is a business use and one not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance of the village. Plaintiff’s Exhibit 6 is illuminative of the non-permitted use. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings and appropriate conclusions of law will be made. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice. [See 128 Misc. 441.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Village of Great Neck Estates v. Bemak & Lehman, Inc., 223 A.D. 853 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

223 A.D. 853 (Village of Great Neck Estates v. Bemak & Lehman, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Partition Street Corp. v. Zoning Board of Appeals
302 A.D.2d 65 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
City of Yonkers v. Rentways, Inc.
109 N.E.2d 597 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)
City of Yonkers v. Rentways, Inc.
280 A.D. 821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)
The Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna
24 N.W.2d 244 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1946)