Village of Glouster v. Public Utilities Commission

97 N.E.2d 658, 155 Ohio St. 162, 155 Ohio St. (N.S.) 162, 44 Ohio Op. 146, 1951 Ohio LEXIS 549
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 21, 1951
Docket32315
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 97 N.E.2d 658 (Village of Glouster v. Public Utilities Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Village of Glouster v. Public Utilities Commission, 97 N.E.2d 658, 155 Ohio St. 162, 155 Ohio St. (N.S.) 162, 44 Ohio Op. 146, 1951 Ohio LEXIS 549 (Ohio 1951).

Opinion

*163 Per Curiam.

The New York Central Railroad Company filed with the Public Utilities Commission an application for authority to discontinue the operation, between Columbus and the Ohio-West Virginia state line at Kanauga, Gallia county, and intermediate points,, of its passenger trains Nos. 5 and 6, which operate between Columbus, Ohio, and Charleston, West Virginia. The applicant alleges in its application that the number of passengers and volume of express and mail traffic available to and using the trains are insufficient to justify their continued operation either on the basis of benefit to the public or financial return to applicant.

After hearing, the Public Utilities Commission granted the application for discontinuance of service, and the cause is in this court on appeal from that order.

As this court will not substitute its judgment for that of the commission, the evidence being in conflict, and, as the order is not unlawful or unreasonable or against the manifest weight of the evidence, it is, therefore, affirmed.

Order affirmed.

Zimmerman, Stewart, Middleton, Taft, ' Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur. Weygandt, C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ormet Corp. v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission
589 N.E.2d 98 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1990)
State, Ex Rel. Flittner v. Baldwin
162 N.E.2d 137 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1958)
Wooster Freight Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission
163 Ohio St. (N.S.) 11 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 N.E.2d 658, 155 Ohio St. 162, 155 Ohio St. (N.S.) 162, 44 Ohio Op. 146, 1951 Ohio LEXIS 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/village-of-glouster-v-public-utilities-commission-ohio-1951.