Home/New York Court of Appeals/Village of Chestnut Ridge v. Town of Ramapo

Village of Chestnut Ridge v. Town of Ramapo

934 N.E.2d 882, 15 N.Y.3d 817, 2010 NY Slip Op 81222, 908 N.Y.S.2d 149, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 2261
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Village of Chestnut Ridge v. Town of Ramapo. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 N.Y.3d 793 →
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 2, 2010·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie, movants previously having moved for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the August 2007 Appellate Division order from which leave to appeal is currently sought (12 NY3d 793 [2009]). Moreover, no motion for leave to appeal would lie to the Court of Appeals from the March 2010 Supreme Court judgment to bring up for review the August 2007 Appellate Division order as movants have appealed that judgment to the Appellate Division and simultaneous appeals do not lie to both the Appellate Division and the Court of Appeals (see Parker v Rogerson, 35 NY2d 751, 753 [1974]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Village of Chestnut Ridge v. Town of Ramapo, 934 N.E.2d 882, 15 N.Y.3d 817, 2010 NY Slip Op 81222, 908 N.Y.S.2d 149, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 2261 (N.Y. 2010).

934 N.E.2d 882 (Village of Chestnut Ridge v. Town of Ramapo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parker v. Rogerson
320 N.E.2d 650 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)