Village of Cattaraugus v. Johnson
233 A.D. 799
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the burden of establishing a violation of the ordinance in cutting a shade tree was upon the plaintiff and whether [800]*800or not the tree in question was a shade tree within the meaning of the ordinance was a question of fact and we cannot say that the decision of the trial justice in favor of the defendant was contrary to the evidence. All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Thompson and Crosby, JJ. [139 Misc. 368.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Village of Cattaraugus v. Johnson, 233 A.D. 799 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
233 A.D. 799 (Village of Cattaraugus v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Village of Cattaraugus v. Johnson
139 Misc. 368 (New York County Courts, 1931)