Village of Buchanan v. Town of Cortlandt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Village of Buchanan v. Town of Cortlandt

263 A.D. 1003, 33 N.Y.S.2d 475, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7840

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 9, 1942·Published

Opinion

Submission of a controversy on agreed statement of facts, pursuant to sections 546 and 547 of the Civil Practice Act. Judgment unanimously directed for plaintiff in the sum of $1,985.86, with interest thereon from the 1st day of January, 1941, without costs. We are of opinion that neither the village nor the territory annexed was responsible for the indebtedness incurred in behalf of the lighting district after December 13, 1934, the date when [1004]*1004the first contract, by its terms, expired; Present — Hagarty, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Submission of a controversy on agreed statement of facts, pursuant to sections 546 and 547 of the Civil Practice Act. Judgment unanimously directed for plaintiff in the sum of $1,985.86, with interest thereon from the 1st day of January, 1941, without costs. We are of opinion that neither the village nor the territory annexed was responsible for the indebtedness incurred in behalf of the lighting district after December 13, 1934, the date when [1004]*1004the first contract, by its terms, expired; Present — Hagarty, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Village of Buchanan v. Town of Cortlandt, 263 A.D. 1003, 33 N.Y.S.2d 475, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7840 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

263 A.D. 1003 (Village of Buchanan v. Town of Cortlandt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.