Village of Boonville v. Maltbie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Village of Boonville v. Maltbie

246 A.D. 887

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1936·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal granted. [See 245 App. Div. 468.] The court hereby certifies that the following question of law has arisen which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: Did the Public Service Commission in its determination fixing rates in this proceeding properly decide that as matter of law such rates should not include a return on the value of the property owned by the village and used and useful in the public service? Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal granted. [See 245 App. Div. 468.] The court hereby certifies that the following question of law has arisen which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: Did the Public Service Commission in its determination fixing rates in this proceeding properly decide that as matter of law such rates should not include a return on the value of the property owned by the village and used and useful in the public service? Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Village of Boonville v. Maltbie, 246 A.D. 887 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

246 A.D. 887 (Village of Boonville v. Maltbie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related