Village of Boonville v. Maltbie
This text of 246 A.D. 887 (Village of Boonville v. Maltbie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal granted. [See 245 App. Div. 468.] The court hereby certifies that the following question of law has arisen which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: Did the Public Service Commission in its determination fixing rates in this proceeding properly decide that as matter of law such rates should not include a return on the value of the property owned by the village and used and useful in the public service? Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D. 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/village-of-boonville-v-maltbie-nyappdiv-1936.