Village of Ardsley v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
This text of 274 A.D. 1075 (Village of Ardsley v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to reform a certificate of continuance of a surety bond, and a surety bond, and to recover thereon as reformed, order denying, conditionally, appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute the action, reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs. There was a delay of approximately three years, and younger issues have been tried. There is no meritorious showing that the delay was not unreasonable. Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
274 A.D. 1075, 85 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1949 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/village-of-ardsley-v-aetna-casualty-surety-co-nyappdiv-1949.