Village of Amherst v. Wragg

40 N.E.2d 149, 139 Ohio St. 371, 139 Ohio St. (N.S.) 371, 22 Ohio Op. 418, 1942 Ohio LEXIS 530
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 4, 1942·No. 28579·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*372 By the Court.

This litigation was instituted originally by virtue of Sections 4311 and 4314, General Code, upon request of a taxpayer.

Neither those sections nor the Appellate Procedure Act (Section 12223-1 et seq., General Code) confer upon the taxpayer in the instant case the right to prosecute an appeal. City of Middletown v. City Commission, 138 Ohio St., 596, at page 603 et seq., 37 N. E. (2d), 609.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart and Zimmerman, JJ., concur. Bettman, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Village of Amherst v. Wragg, 40 N.E.2d 149, 139 Ohio St. 371, 139 Ohio St. (N.S.) 371, 22 Ohio Op. 418, 1942 Ohio LEXIS 530 (Ohio 1942).

40 N.E.2d 149 (Village of Amherst v. Wragg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Proceedings to Compel McAuley
408 N.E.2d 497 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1979)
Lindblom v. Board of Tax Appeals
85 N.E.2d 376 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1949)