Villafane v. Industrial Construction Management, Ltd.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard H. Sherman, J.), entered March 27, 2015, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.
Defendant failed to establish prima facie that it is an out-of-possession landlord with no right of reentry or maintenance (see Vasquez v RVA Garage, 238 AD2d 407 [2d Dept 1997]). In addition to testimony as to the terms of an oral lease agreement with the commercial tenant, defendant offered only a carefully tailored affidavit by the tenant’s principal, who is also the mother of defendant’s principal. This evidence is not sufficient to eliminate any material issues of fact from the case (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851 [1985]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
137 A.D.3d 526 (Villafane v. Industrial Construction Management, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.