Villa v. Van Schaick

Supreme Court

Villa v. Van Schaick

296 U.S. 544

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 25, 1935

DocketNo. 27

StatusPublished

This text of 296 U.S. 544 (Villa v. Van Schaick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Villa v. Van Schaick, 296 U.S. 544 (1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed [545]*545for the want of a properly presented federal question. Lynch v. New York, 293 U. S. 52.

Mr. Hartwell Cabell, with whom Mr. Asa B. Kellogg was on the brief, for appellants. Messrs. Louis H. Pink, Walter B. Herendeen, and Benjamin Potoker were on the brief for appellee. Mr. John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney General of New York, Mr. Henry Epstein, Solicitor General, and Mr. Joseph A. McLaughlin, Assistant Attorney General, were on the brief for the Industrial Commissioner of New York, intervener, in support of the position of appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed [545]*545for the want of a properly presented federal question. Lynch v. New York, 293 U. S. 52.

Mr. Hartwell Cabell, with whom Mr. Asa B. Kellogg was on the brief, for appellants. Messrs. Louis H. Pink, Walter B. Herendeen, and Benjamin Potoker were on the brief for appellee. Mr. John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney General of New York, Mr. Henry Epstein, Solicitor General, and Mr. Joseph A. McLaughlin, Assistant Attorney General, were on the brief for the Industrial Commissioner of New York, intervener, in support of the position of appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

296 U.S. 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/villa-v-van-schaick-scotus-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack