Villa v. Van Schaick

Supreme Court

Villa v. Van Schaick

296 U.S. 544

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Villa v. Van Schaick. Read the opinion of the Court — 299 U.S. 152 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 25, 1935·No. No. 27·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed [545]*545for the want of a properly presented federal question. Lynch v. New York, 293 U. S. 52.

Mr. Hartwell Cabell, with whom Mr. Asa B. Kellogg was on the brief, for appellants. Messrs. Louis H. Pink, Walter B. Herendeen, and Benjamin Potoker were on the brief for appellee. Mr. John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney General of New York, Mr. Henry Epstein, Solicitor General, and Mr. Joseph A. McLaughlin, Assistant Attorney General, were on the brief for the Industrial Commissioner of New York, intervener, in support of the position of appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed [545]*545for the want of a properly presented federal question. Lynch v. New York, 293 U. S. 52.

Mr. Hartwell Cabell, with whom Mr. Asa B. Kellogg was on the brief, for appellants. Messrs. Louis H. Pink, Walter B. Herendeen, and Benjamin Potoker were on the brief for appellee. Mr. John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney General of New York, Mr. Henry Epstein, Solicitor General, and Mr. Joseph A. McLaughlin, Assistant Attorney General, were on the brief for the Industrial Commissioner of New York, intervener, in support of the position of appellee.

Villa v. Van Schaick, 296 U.S. 544 (1935).

Pincite

296 U.S. 544 (Villa v. Van Schaick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related