Villa v. State
This text of 165 N.E. 771 (Villa v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only question sought to be presented by this appeal is the alleged error of the court in the giving to the jury of one certain instruction. It is now well settled that when error is predicated upon the action of the trial court in the giving or refusing to give instructions to the jury, the appellant is required by cl. 5 of Rule 22 of this court to set out in his brief all of the instructions given by the court. Linn Grove, etc., Power Co. v. Fennig (1927), 86 Ind. App. 170, 154 N. E. 877; Hiser v. Lichfield (1926), 87 Ind. App. 19, 154 N. E. 510; Guetling v. State (1927), 198 Ind. 718, 153 N. E. 765.
The court’s instructions are not set out in appellant’s brief.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 N.E. 771, 89 Ind. App. 49, 1929 Ind. App. LEXIS 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/villa-v-state-indctapp-1929.