Villa v. Berryhill

697 F. App'x 886
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 28, 2017
DocketNo. 17-1670
StatusPublished

This text of 697 F. App'x 886 (Villa v. Berryhill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Villa v. Berryhill, 697 F. App'x 886 (8th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[887]*887Karen Villa appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Upon de novo review, we find no basis, and Villa offers none, for overturning the district court’s determination that substantial evidence supported the denial. See Gann v. Berryhill, 864 F.3d 947, 950-51 (8th Cir. 2017) (reviewing de novo district court’s decision to affirm denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income; by statute, Commissioner’s findings as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, are conclusive). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rhonda Gann v. Nancy A. Berryhill
864 F.3d 947 (Eighth Circuit, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
697 F. App'x 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/villa-v-berryhill-ca8-2017.