Villa v. Berryhill
This text of 697 F. App'x 886 (Villa v. Berryhill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[887]*887Karen Villa appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Upon de novo review, we find no basis, and Villa offers none, for overturning the district court’s determination that substantial evidence supported the denial. See Gann v. Berryhill, 864 F.3d 947, 950-51 (8th Cir. 2017) (reviewing de novo district court’s decision to affirm denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income; by statute, Commissioner’s findings as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, are conclusive). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
697 F. App'x 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/villa-v-berryhill-ca8-2017.