Villa Mae Simmons v. Maison Blanche Company

367 F.2d 583
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 2, 1966
Docket22928_1
StatusPublished

This text of 367 F.2d 583 (Villa Mae Simmons v. Maison Blanche Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Villa Mae Simmons v. Maison Blanche Company, 367 F.2d 583 (5th Cir. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant complains of charges given and of other charges refused at the trial in the district court. She asserts that the district court committed error in not excusing a juror for cause. We have reviewed the record and are unable to find reversible error. Therefore, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
367 F.2d 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/villa-mae-simmons-v-maison-blanche-company-ca5-1966.