Vilas v. Jones

4 How. Pr. 367
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 15, 1848
StatusPublished

This text of 4 How. Pr. 367 (Vilas v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vilas v. Jones, 4 How. Pr. 367 (N.Y. 1848).

Opinion

This was a decision that a court of equity would not relieve a party, sureties, on a promissory note, after a judgment at law, in which they had failed to sustain the defence of usury. Also, whether a mere surety was a borrower within the meaning of the usury act of 1837.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 How. Pr. 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vilas-v-jones-ny-1848.