Vila v. State
375 So. 2d 31, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15805
Opinion
The appellant’s probation was revoked only upon “hearsay” evidence, with no other legal competent evidence before the trial court. This was error. Jones v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 348 So.2d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Jones v. State, 348 So.2d 942 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); Combs v. State, 351 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).
The order revoking probation is reversed and set aside, with directions to reinstate the appellant to probation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vila v. State, 375 So. 2d 31, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15805 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).
375 So. 2d 31 (Vila v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Combs v. State
351 So. 2d 1103 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Jones v. State
348 So. 2d 942 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Jones v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COM'N
348 So. 2d 681 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)