Viking Freight Company, Inc. v. Keck, Judge

153 S.W.2d 166, 202 Ark. 663, 1941 Ark. LEXIS 258
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided June 2, 1941·No. 4-6387·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Smith, J.

This is a companion case to that of Viking Freight Company, Inc. v. Circuit Court for Chickasawba District of Mississippi County, Arkansas, et al., No. 6386 (ante, p. 656), in which the opinion has this day been delivered. There is this difference only between the eases. Sangalli, the plaintiff in that case, is a resident of this state; Holmes, the plaintiff in the instant case, is a nonresident of this state. They were injured at the same time, and in the same collision, otherwise the cases are identical.

Upon the authority of the case of Yockey v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co., 183 Ark. 601, 37 S. W. 2d 694, it must be held that if either case may lie maintained in this state, both may be, and the writ of prohibition is, therefore, denied in the instant case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Viking Freight Company, Inc. v. Keck, Judge, 153 S.W.2d 166, 202 Ark. 663, 1941 Ark. LEXIS 258 (Ark. 1941).

153 S.W.2d 166 (Viking Freight Company, Inc. v. Keck, Judge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hicks v. Wolfe
307 S.W.2d 784 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1957)
Running v. Southwest Freight Lines, Inc.
303 S.W.2d 578 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1957)