Viking Freight Company, Inc. v. Keck, Judge
This text of 153 S.W.2d 166 (Viking Freight Company, Inc. v. Keck, Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a companion case to that of Viking Freight Company, Inc. v. Circuit Court for Chickasawba District of Mississippi County, Arkansas, et al., No. 6386 (ante, p. 656), in which the opinion has this day been delivered. There is this difference only between the eases. Sangalli, the plaintiff in that case, is a resident of this state; Holmes, the plaintiff in the instant case, is a nonresident of this state. They were injured at the same time, and in the same collision, otherwise the cases are identical.
Upon the authority of the case of Yockey v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co., 183 Ark. 601, 37 S. W. 2d 694, it must be held that if either case may lie maintained in this state, both may be, and the writ of prohibition is, therefore, denied in the instant case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 S.W.2d 166, 202 Ark. 663, 1941 Ark. LEXIS 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/viking-freight-company-inc-v-keck-judge-ark-1941.