Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam v. Usdhs
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
VIJAYAKUMAR THURAISSIGIAM, No. 18-55313 Petitioner-Appellant,
D.C. No.
v.
3:18 cv-0135
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND AJB SECURITY; U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION; U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION ORDER SERVICES; U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT; CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of DHS; WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General; MARK A. MORGAN, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner of CBP; THOMAS HOMAN; KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; PETE FLORES, San Diego Field Director, CBP; GREGORY ARCHAMBEAULT, San Diego Field Office Director, ICE; FRED FIGUEROA, Warden, Otay Mesa Detention Center, Respondents-Appellees.
2 THURAISSIGIAM V. USDHS
On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States
Filed August 12, 2020
Before: A. Wallace Tashima, M. Margaret McKeown, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.
Order
ORDER
In accordance with the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States, “remand[ing] the case with directions that the application for habeas corpus be dismissed,” United States v. Thuraissigiam, 140 S. Ct. 1959, 1983 (2020), the judgment of the district court, which dismissed with prejudice the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, Thuraissigiam v. U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 287 F. Supp. 3d 1077, 1083 (S.D. Cal. 2018), is
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
967 F.3d 977 (Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam v. Usdhs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.